The Patriots are “leaning toward” keeping Gronkowski on the 53-man roster to start the regular season, according to NFL Network’s Albert Breer.
https://www.patspropaganda.com/the-patriots-are-leaning-toward-keeping/
Coach Belichick With Some Basic Gameplan Advice For His Team Before Their Final Preseason Game
Maybe they need a pregame speech from George Constanza.
https://www.patspropaganda.com/lolpats-coach-belichick-with-some-basic/
W2W4: Five things we’ll be focused on in Giants-Patriots – ESPN Boston
W2W4: Five things we’ll be focused on in Giants-Patriots – ESPN Boston
Good list, but again, I think Leon Washington is safe. There’s really not much for him to prove returning kicks in the preseason, he’s consistently shown he’s a top NFL return guy. Why risk him to injury making him prove something he’s already proven?
Instead they’ve given other guys chances to show what they can do should they need to go down the depth chart.
151 regular season wins for the Patriots under Belichick. That’s 26 more victories for any coach during that span, outdistancing Philadelphia’s (and now Kansas City’s) Reid. Mike Shanahan (106), Tony Dungy (104), Jeff Fisher (104) and Tom Coughlin (102) are next, yet well behind Belichick.
The Billenium: Belichick by the numbers – Stats Driven – Boston sports statistics blog
Not bad for a guy who doesn’t know how to draft. But seriously folks, great stuff in this one and it was nearly impossible to pick just one amazing BB stat.
https://www.patspropaganda.com/151-regular-season-wins-for-the-patriots-under/
If the over/under is at 2.5 for new players picked up after the 53 man roster cuts, which one are you taking? I’d think Pats will look to add at least two new players, most likely veterans they feel are easily plug & play types, to fill out the back end of roster. I’m thinking along both the OL & DL. Also a decent chance they add a DB or WR if someone they covet shakes free, imo. Thoughts?
Yeah, your thoughts = my thoughts. Grab an OL and a DL, veteran guys who get cut because their teams don’t want to guarantee their salaries.
That’s why I think guys like Buchanan and Bequette are likely to get the axe (try to get them on the practice squad). They’re just too thin at OL/DL to keep around developmental defensive ends who don’t bring a lot to the party at this point. Buchanan is the priority for me there.
Tough seeing it be more than two guys though, I think that’s the sweet spot. My wildcard position would be cornerback., wouldn’t rule out WR but I’m always pounding the “throw the young guys in there and let them grow” drum.
Of course, it will be an interesting weekend, guaranteed to have one of those spit-take “they cut HIM!?!?!” moments.
I think this year the offense will use more 3WR and 1TE sets and occasionally use multiple TE sets. What do you think the offense will look like this year?
They’ll do what they always do, attack the opposing defense however they see fit, but I don’t think we should write off 12 personnel because of the inherent advantages it provides in the modern NFL.
11 personnel doesn’t cause the same kind of problems because there’s no choice for the defense to make between base or sub – they’ll go sub 90% of the time at least.
But with Gronk and Ballard, or Gronk and Sudfeld, defenses will have to choose what they want to do. And then the Pats will take advantage.
Until Gronk gets back could they go more 11? Depends on how you feel about Sudfeld/Fells vs. Dobson/Boyce/Edelman and how they matchup against the defense.
Now if the Pats prove they can run effectively out of 11 personnel that can alter the dynamic a bit because it changes the question for the defense. Then it asks the defense if they have a linebacker or safety who can cover one of the Pats’ WRs. Most don’t, but again it’s not like it’s Moss-Welker-Stallworth-Gaffney anymore, they’d likely be covering a rookie.
So if they have a physical safety they might be okay dropping him down on say, Dobson, and getting really physical with him. That’s why I think we’ll still see a lot of 12 personnel.
It’s a game-to-game, and even snap-to-snap, thing. We’ll see how it plays out, but I’d expect a pretty good balance, with more 12 than 11 at a 50-40 ratio (10 percent will be short yardage/10/21/22/etc.).
