PatsPropaganda

An Independent Patriots Blog

by

A lot of times we have multiple options in the huddle, and sometimes you end up with the perfect blend and perfect balance when you do that, and sometimes the defense, when you’re trying to get certain things against a specific look, sometimes you can get a little skewed,” he said. “We certainly don’t want to take the freedom away from our quarterback to get us into a good play and we don’t want to become just a call-it-on-the-sideline team when we have a quarterback that’s capable of doing a lot of good things with our offense at the line of scrimmage.

New England Patriots’ Josh McDaniels talks red zone, run game – ESPN Boston

As I’ve said before I really don’t get into criticizing the “play-calling” because we just don’t have enough information. Did Brady change the play at the line? Did someone run the wrong route? It’s just not as simple as ‘wow, McDaniels is calling bad plays’.

https://www.patspropaganda.com/a-lot-of-times-we-have-multiple-options-in-the/

Who you think New Englands gonna extend first Aqib Talib or Julian Edelman? i think the obvious is edleman but talib is so clutch idrk

by

Yeah, this will be the big debate as soon as the season ends until free agency starts. I expect both of them to test the market, but I’d think teams might be a little spooked by Edelman being raised by New England, not many of those players have gone on to duplicate their success elsewhere.

Teams that would be interested in Talib might want to make sure they have a good locker room in place. In a football-first environment like the Patriots, he’s done well. Somewhere else, where there are a lot of sideshows might make for a different Talib.

But if you have to choose one, I think the answer is pretty easy. How hard is it to find a slot receiver, especially when the Pats are already paying Danny Amendola a pretty good chunk of change?

And then, how hard is it to find a #1 corner?

I’d love to keep both but I think Talib has to be the priority if push comes to shove.

by

For what it’s worth, as we explained here, history tells us that teams who play closer games over the course of the regular season tend to do better when the playoffs roll around. Six of the last 10 Super Bowl winners had an average margin of victory of eight points or less, while on the other end of the spectrum, only two of the Super Bowl winners in that span had an average margin of victory of 10 points or better.

patriots – Living on the edge: Margin for error remains slim with Patriots – WEEI | Christopher Price

https://www.patspropaganda.com/for-what-its-worth-as-we-explained-here-history/