• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

PatsPropaganda

An Independent Patriots Blog

  • Home
    • Free Agency
    • Draft
    • Videos
  • Prop Shop
  • Analysis
    • Pats Posits
    • Gameplan
    • Film Review
  • Belichick Hoodie Database
    • Bill Belichick Current Hoodie Stats
  • Draft Big Boards
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Hall of Fame
  • About/Contact

June 19, 2013 by Mike Dussault

Who says the Patriots need to start two wideouts or use two wideouts on the majority of their offensive snaps? If anyone’s willing to be proactive and shift the style of their offense in midstream, it’s New England. And after their success running the ball with Stevan Ridley last year, it’s possible that the Patriots could move to an offense that uses two running backs and two tight ends as its base set, with Amendola as the only “wideout,” but with Rob Gronkowski and Aaron Hernandez serving as wideout-like weapons downfield. They’re also very deep at tight end, with the likes of Jake Ballard, Daniel Fells, and Michael Hoomanawanui all possible contributors if they make the roster. As always with the Patriots and their offensive wrinkles, stay tuned.

Bill Barnwell on the teams that still have holes in their rosters – Grantland

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: offense

Primary Sidebar

The Original 28-3 Comeback Tee

Recent Posts

  • As the Patriots gain a WR1, they lose a TE2. So what could the future be at TE?
  • An eye on OTAs
  • Pats Procrastination – YouTube show Episode 95 – the schedule is out!
  • It’s that rookie time of year!
  • For the love of the game

Archives

June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« May    

Footer

Pages

  • About/Contact
  • Bill Belichick Current Hoodie Stats
  • Hall of Fame
  • Privacy Policy

Random Post

(no title)

Copyright © 2026 · Genesis Sample Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in