• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

PatsPropaganda

An Independent Patriots Blog

  • Home
    • Free Agency
    • Draft
    • Videos
  • Prop Shop
  • Analysis
    • Pats Posits
    • Gameplan
    • Film Review
  • Belichick Hoodie Database
    • Bill Belichick Current Hoodie Stats
  • Draft Big Boards
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Hall of Fame
  • About/Contact

How do you like Atlanta’s O-line vs. Jones, Ninkovich, Wilfork, Kelly, and company? If Atlanta’s unit is as dinged up as I’ve heard they are and the Pats can get pressure from 4 like they did in the first 3 games, do you think Atlanta still scores 27+ points (which most predictions have slated them for)? Will the matchup be easier or more difficult than the D-Line-O-Line matchups in Games 1-3?

September 27, 2013 by Mike Dussault

This here is really the key to the game. Both starting tackles are out, Ryan is not a threat to run, that means the pass rush has to cause disruption. They have to get Ryan off the spot. If they don’t, it won’t matter how well the secondary plays.

This is the kind of game where Chandler Jones could make a name for himself on national television. He’ll get moved all over the line to give him an advantage, but now’s when we get a good barometer of where he’s at. Will he be a top defensive end in the NFL? Or is he still an inconsistent work-in-progress?

I expect Ninkovich to be his usual solid self, and I’d even expect a couple blitzes from the linebackers. Tommy Kelly is another big key.

I know I’m a defense-first guy, but I think this game is won or lost by the Patriots front seven.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Not a patriots related question but do you think that the broncos can sustain this high powered offense to a Super Bowl win, it reminds of me the 07 patriots where they started off really hot then started to cool down, what do you think

September 27, 2013 by Mike Dussault

It’s certainly not going to get easier for them as they put more on tape, the opponents get better, and the weather gets worse, even at home.  That was one thing about Peyton with the Colts, he always had that dome, but now even his home playoff games he’s going to have to deal with the elements.

I think part of the 2007 Pats running out of steam was that they were playing so angry the first few months of the season, fueled by the Spygate baloney. You can only run on that for so long.

But the interesting corollary is Wes Welker. You look at the Pats teams of 2007-2012 and even in the losses you’ll see Welker still picking up a bunch of catches. For that reason my idea right now, if I’m an opponent, is to focus on Thomas and Decker and force Peyton to throw 15 5-yard passes to Welker to move the ball.

That’s what always killed the Pats offense with Welker. Not only do you force continued execution, you add up hits on Welker and by the end of the game he won’t be as sharp as he was at the start.

I think if teams start to do this in the coming weeks, the wear and tear will start to build up on Welker. Still, Thomas and Decker are great players and Peyton will make some pinpoint throws to them.

The key is just to stay close and make the plays in the clutch, and hope they don’t. But yes, I expect they’ll slow down. 

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Bill Belichick Press Conference Transcript

September 27, 2013 by Mike Dussault

Bill Belichick Press Conference Transcript

Friday BB pressers are always the best…

Q: Do you chart explosive plays? The term has become more prevalent recently. How do the explosive plays allowed by you defensively this year compare to the last couple years?

BB: We gave up a ton of them last year. I don’t know, I don’t really think it’s that big of a thing. Thirty yards, 40 yards, 45 yards, 35 yards, however you cut it up, it’s probably going to be about the same. A couple plays are going to fall short of being explosive plays but they’re really big pretty big plays. There are going to be other plays that aren’t. I don’t know. We obviously, any play that’s significant defensively, we’re aware of that as a potential repeat play for somebody else to look at it and even if they miss it, we still look at it at as a big play. Say he overthrew it or something but it’s open, we look at it and say, ‘Well, if the next team sees that, they might feel like that’s a good opportunity.’ We look at that as a big play as far as trying to correct it and do a better job with ourselves. The plays are what they are. That’s a matter of record, wherever you want to break it off, you can break it off. But there are a lot of plays that aren’t big plays and there are honestly sometimes a couple big plays where you’re kind of right there and you feel like you should make the play, like we had a couple last year where a ball went off our hands and went for a 40-yard catch and it really could have been an interception. So if you’re the other team looking at that, saying is that really the kind of play you really want to run, or did they just have a fortunate result to it? I think it’s a little more by the actual play.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: bill belichick

Do you think Brady’s stats will start to improve greatly once Gronk, Vereen and Amendola return?

September 27, 2013 by Mike Dussault

Certainly in the red zone and third down, where they’ve been most weakened the last two weeks. I mean, Gronk alone has been the most dominant red zone and third down weapon in the NFL the last three seasons, so talk about being exactly what the Hoodie ordered.

There’s no question things will be better once all three of them are back, but in my view, Gronk is the key.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

If brady and belichick would have won the Super Bowl when they went 16-0 but would never go to the Super Bowl again, what do you think there legacies would be

September 27, 2013 by Mike Dussault

That’s a lot of hypotheticals, but really, if the Pats had gone 19-0 it’s hard to argue that they wouldn’t be the best team of all-time. And really, as it stands, they’re clearly the best team ever to not win the Super Bowl for whatever that counts. So, then they would’ve won 4 out of 7 Super Bowls, including the undisputed greatest team of all-time. That looks pretty good to me to say they’d be the greatest coach-QB combo ever.

Still, I think in the long run the two Super Bowl losses to the Giants are ultimately a positive point in their career discussions, because it comes with playing in eight conference championships, winning six of them. Not to mention both of their Super Bowl losses came on the final drive. That’s a very thin line.

So what does it all mean? I don’t really get too wrapped up in ranking who’s the greatest of all-time whether it’s the team, coaches or players. All I know is that there has never been a better run in NFL history and I’ve enjoyed every moment of it.

A fourth Super Bowl win would really be the perfect way to come full circle, especially considering it would be with just BB/TFB from the 2001 win. That’s pretty amazing when you think about it.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

What is wrong with the Pats run defense? Seems like they have improved on the pass rush side at the expense of the run D.

September 27, 2013 by Mike Dussault

Which I’d actually be okay. In fact that was kind of what I was saying a lot this offseason. Look, the pass defense has been the achilles heel of this team for the past three seasons, and as we saw last year, when they had their best run defense in a decade, that it still didn’t matter much, even against the Ravens who have traditionally been a run-first team. 

So I’m really not that concerned about it, but I think part of it is that Spikes was not himself the first two weeks for whatever reason. He can singlehandedly destroy a run game.

We’ll see how it plays out in the coming weeks, but if the pass defense keeps playing well I’m fine if it comes at the expense of the run defense a little bit. But with their defensive line and linebackers I’d expect the run D will still be top-10.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Thoughts on Brandon Bolden for this week’s game? Do you think he’ll play a big role or a more toned down contribution?

September 27, 2013 by Mike Dussault

I think we could see him take on even more of a role than he did last week. I’ve made no secret that he’s my favorite back on the roster, no offense to Ridley, I just like how aggressive Bolden runs plus his ability to catch the ball is pretty underrated. 

So maybe I’m a little bit biased in his favor, but I’d look to see him get an increased role this week, especially if the Pats aren’t protecting a lead and need to throw the ball a lot.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 970
  • Page 971
  • Page 972
  • Page 973
  • Page 974
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 2376
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

The Original 28-3 Comeback Tee

Recent Posts

  • Pats Procrastination – YouTube show Episode 96 – AJ and the “off” season
  • As the Patriots gain a WR1, they lose a TE2. So what could the future be at TE?
  • An eye on OTAs
  • Pats Procrastination – YouTube show Episode 95 – the schedule is out!
  • It’s that rookie time of year!

Archives

July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Jun    

Footer

Pages

  • About/Contact
  • Bill Belichick Current Hoodie Stats
  • Hall of Fame
  • Privacy Policy

Random Post

PatsPropaganda & Frenz Podcast: 5/15 Patriots Draft Recap 11am EST

PatsPropaganda & Frenz Podcast: 5/15 Patriots Draft Recap 11am EST Join Frenz and I this morning as we recap the Pats’ draft haul and what we think are still concerns facing the team’s depth.

Copyright © 2026 · Genesis Sample Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in