Mike Dussault

Just depends on the game. They’ll run a 34 when they want to focus on stopping the run. They’ll run more 43 or nickel if they’re a little more focused on stopping the pass.

They played no 34 against the Broncos and were gashed. They could’ve changed to it if they cared, but that was the game plan. The Broncos game truly illustrated where they miss Wilfork. 

There was a reason that Wilfork became a three down defensive lineman, because he was good insurance against the run in the sub defense. Sub runs killed the early 2010 Patriots and once they locked it down they went on an impressive win streak. That was all because of Wilfork.

Peyton’s definitely gotten his shots in too. ‘05, ’06 x2, ’09, ’10. But I think it comes down to the how much talent was in the secondary. No question, this is the Pats best secondary since 2004, which is impressive.

But this game was a lot about the elements and how the game unfolded. Manning and the passing offense never got warmed up and when they fell behind and had to start throwing the ball, they were still cold.

However, in the big picture, I think you have to wonder if Manning should even want homefield advantage. His ball just didn’t have the same zip that Brady’s did and while a rematch is very possible, I feel pretty confident Brady is the better quarterback if elements come into play.

I think if last week’s first-half Patriots show up it could be tight. If the second-half Patriots show up, NE wins 14+.