PatsPropaganda

An Independent Patriots Blog

Archives for January 23, 2015

Is this game all about getting a lead and limiting Lynch’s touches as much as possible? Since the Lions game, the Pats have only started one game particularly well – last week vs the Colts, and look what happened there. They seem very adept at keeping their foot on the oppositions throat when in the lead. If the Pats get ahead, and Seattle has to throw more, I like our chances with Revis v Baldwin, Browner v Willson, and Arrington+Mccourty v Kearse. If we fall behind I worry about our run D.

by

Valid concerns, but I think with the way our secondary matches up with them, stopping Lynch is probably already the biggest key of the game. Would a points deficit exaggerate that? Of course, but we’ve seen this Patriots team dig out of a hole quite a few times before.

You just can’t tell how the ball is going to bounce next Sunday. Will the Seahawks have some Tyree magic? Or will it be the Patriots who things break towards like they did in the early 2000s?

All I know is that this Patriots team has proven over and over again the last few years that they’re going to be ready to fight for 60 minutes. They won’t cave like the Broncos did last year and just become a snowball of errors.

I was so excited for this super bowl after the pounding we have the colts. Beat the Seahawks and all this (unfounded) statements of “they haven’t won anything since spygate!” are over. But now there’s this, and while I think they are telling the truth and didn’t deflate any of their game balls, it feels like people will try to invalidate this next win if we get it. Which is just plain upsetting.

by

I hear that, but really, those who will invalidate it already would have anyway. Do you think the guy who wrote a book about Spygate and how they’re still cheating was going to be won over by them winning another one?

This is why the NFL’s ruling of it is so key. That will sway the middle in either direction. There will certainly be those who say whatever the punishment is is too light. Then those people will turn their hate to the NFL.

But once the ruling is issued the media fervor will die down and we’ll settle back to our corners of those who like the Patriots, those who hate the Patriots, and those that just know they won the Super Bowl and don’t really care either way.

Football by Football: Russell Wilson: No Edge, No Chance

by

Football by Football: Russell Wilson: No Edge, No Chance

Good read from Matt Chatham on one of the most concerning elements for the Patriots’ Super Bowl hopes – Russell Wilson making plays outside the pocket.

As has been touched on plenty in the early game breakdowns, the Pats will likely use some kind of spy system, just as they dropped an interior rusher in ‘12 against Wilson. But the key will be Chandler and Ninkovich playing disciplined and keeping Wilson in the pocket.

He might make some plays from the pocket, but they’ll be far less deadly than the ones he’ll rack up if he’s allowed to squirt outside of it.

4 Things Patriots Should Have Learned From Giant Super Bowl Losses

by

I’m not really sure which Super Bowl loss to the Giants shocked me more.

In 2007, it seemed inconceivable that Eli Manning would be the one quarterback to hand the Patriots a loss, much less that the Giants defense would hold one of the most prolific offenses in history to a mere 14 points.

In 2012, it seemed like everything had lined up for the Patriots revenge tour. They dispatched the Broncos, the team that ended their season in 2005, the Ravens, the team that had ended their season in 2009, and now had another crack at Eli and the Giants.

Different year, same result. The Pats clung to a fourth-quarter lead, only to see Eli lead a miraculous final drive for the win.

So what should the Patriots have learned from those two losses? Here are four things that stand out:

1. Get Offense Going Early: In 2007, the Giants held the ball for a whopping 16-play, 10 minute opening drive. Yes, it ended in a field goal, but that seemed to set a tone early on. In 2012, the Giants opened with a 10-play, six-minute drive, then, after punting, the Pats gave it right back with a safety.

In both Super Bowls, it was nearly the end of the first quarter before the Patriots put together any kind of a sustained drive. A fast start would be a welcome change this time around and we know how devastating the Patriots can be with an early lead.

2. Protect Brady Up The Gut: This isn’t a news flash, the Patriots offensive line got dominated in both Super Bowl, especially up the gut, which is essentially kryptonite to the Pats favored quick-passing offense. Justin Tuck was at the center of it, combining for 4 sacks in the two Super Bowls, along with 3 QB hits in 2012. 

Bryan Stork’s return to practice this week was a good sign for the Pats. They’ll need him, Dan Connolly and Ryan Wendell to have solid games if the Pats offense is to find its stride. Nate Solder and Sebastian Vollmer will be tested as well, but it’s the quick pressure up the middle that is most worrisome.

3. Stay Balanced: In the two Super Bowl losses, the Patriots run/pass balance was 28 percent run, 72 percent pass. This only fed into a Giants pass rush pinning back their ears and getting after Brady. In 2012, the Pats only had the ball for 22:55, and had only one drive that lasted more than five minutes. Running the ball is key to controlling the game and burning the clock.

The Pats must try to do a better job of staying committed to the run. It’s not always easy, but they cannot forget about LeGarrette Blount and Shane Vereen getting their share of carries, even if they’re not having success or behind.

4. Make the Last Stop: In spite of everything I just laid out, the Patriots were two defensive stops at the end of both Super Bowls from winning. We saw the defense come through against the Ravens with an interception and it’s a good bet they’ll need to come through in the clutch once again since this Seahawks team has a knack for late comebacks.