• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

PatsPropaganda

An Independent Patriots Blog

  • Home
    • Free Agency
    • Draft
    • Videos
  • Prop Shop
  • Analysis
    • Pats Posits
    • Gameplan
    • Film Review
  • Belichick Hoodie Database
    • Bill Belichick Current Hoodie Stats
  • Draft Big Boards
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Hall of Fame
  • About/Contact

q and a

Does it feel like BB is prizing versatility on defense at the expense of talent?We have players who can play multple positions, but few outside of Big Vince and Spikes (jury’s still out on jones) seem to dominate

October 19, 2012 by Mike Dussault

This is certainly a criticism that is coming to the forefront in the last week, and I don’t think it’s totally off-base. Spikes is the perfect example, he’s one of the few players that is truly a master of something, but limited in another. At the opposite end of the spectrum you Patrick Chung, who is okay at a lot of things, but not great at anything.

It comes back to value drafting, and you can understand why having guys who can do a number of things could be valuable, especially in the secondary.

Asante Samuel is a good example too. He’s an elite zone read corner, but tackling, man-to-man, and special teams are certainly not his thing.

So I certainly think the case can be made that the balance has shifted too much to guys who can do it all okay, but nothing great. The reason they’re losing games is because they’re not making plays (on either side of the ball) when the game is on the line, and part of that can be a function of just not having enough elite talent in certain spots.

Still, this is a defense that forces turnovers at an elite level so that has to count for something as well. Really I think it just comes down to finding a back end safety with range and leadership. Those are hard to come by these days, but one player like that could elevate the play of the entire secondary, especially someone like McCourty.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: defense, new england patriots, q and a

Should the Patriots dial up pressure and blitz Sanchez? – Boston Sports Then & Now

October 19, 2012 by Mike Dussault

Good question. Let’s take a quick look back at how much the Pats have blitzed him in the past:

2010

  • 11 blitzes, 34 dropbacks. Jets win 28-14
  • 6 blitzes, 36 dropbacks. Pats win 45-3
  • 12 blitzes, 25 dropbacks. Jets win 28-21

2011

  • 7 blitzes, 28 dropbacks. Pats win 30-21
  • 4 blitzes, 47 dropbacks. Pats win 37-16

Now I don’t want to read too much into because obviously there are other factors at play, but it seems like less is more with Sanchez. The two best defensive performances had them sending extra guys on only 6 and 4 drop backs.And given the Patriots struggles in the secondary it might be even more reason to focus more on coverage than sending extra guys.

The Pats should pick their spots, but I think they want to be around 7 or 8 blitzes against the Jets.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: q and a

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2

Primary Sidebar

The Original 28-3 Comeback Tee

Recent Posts

  • Pats Procrastination – YouTube show Episode 63 – off season entertainment
  • The great (?), retired jersey number debate
  • Pats Procrastination Youtube show – Episode 62 – Patriots rookie mini camp and more!
  • Pats Procrastination – YouTube show Episode 61 – the 2025 Draft – a conclusion!
  • Pats Procrastination – YouTube show Episode 60 – the final countdown… to the Draft!

Archives

June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
« May    

Footer

Pages

  • About/Contact
  • Bill Belichick Current Hoodie Stats
  • Hall of Fame
  • Privacy Policy

Random Post

(no title)

Game on!

Copyright © 2025 · Genesis Sample Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in