I’m sticking with my mock draft and saying Goldman as well. Obviously I’d love Shelton but I think he’s as much a pipe dream as JJ Watt was a few years ago. If Goldman’s off the board at 32 I’d say a trade down is just about a lock. Sorry to everyone who’s going to stay up late tonight, excited to see who the Pats pick and then they pick no one.
- Yes, this was the worst loss of his career, but damn did he look good running out of the tunnel.
Draft Day!!!!!!
Remember when I left Hightower off my big board because I felt he was too similar to Spikes? Not my greatest draft moment. (via 1st Round Pick – Dont’a Hightower – New England Patriots – YouTube)
https://www.patspropaganda.com/remember-when-i-left-hightower-off-my-big-board/
Might want to throw Brady into that one trick pony category. Only, as it happens, his “trick” is making defenses disappear, so…
Haha, I like that. But really it’s not like Brady is without his weaknesses and that feeds into why I disagree with people who think putting a small really fast receiver like DeSean Jackson into the mix is going to transform Brady and the offense to what it was in 2007 with Moss.
Mallett was about as close to a one-trick pony as you can get at the QB spot, and his lack of touch is what ultimately sealed his fate here I think. There’s no question, Belichick is intrigued by uniquely talented football players. He’ll at least kick the tires on them, even if they’re old vets with barely anything left in the tank.
Do you think belichick would take someone who is average at multiple positions over someone great at just one
I know what you’re getting at and I think there is a kernel of truth in here but it’s also an oversimplified view of how BB drafts. I’d say Brandon Browner was essentially the kind of player who is great at one thing, but has holes in his game. They made it work last year.
What about Jamie Collins? He didn’t really have one position he stuck at in college and was essentially “good” at a lot of things but not “elite” at anything. He did have immense athleticism though and that allowed the Pats to find a spot for him.
Versatility is always a plus and it’s applicable to almost every position – defensive backs (zone awareness, man coverage athleticism/physicality), defensive linemen (one gap explosion vs. two gap strength), linebacker (downhill run stopping power, coverage ability), offensive linemen (zone blocking athleticism vs. man blocking power), running back (carrying, catching), etc. There are not a lot of players who do one thing so overwhelmingly well that their inability to do anything else is overshadowed.
I’d almost put Dominique Easley in that category, but his elite explosiveness in his pass rush also helps him do other things like we saw when he played some defensive end last year and did a good job setting the edge.
What are the single most valued skillsets in the modern NFL? The only one trick ponies who can get any recognition are pass rushers, otherwise at other positions you have to be able to be competent across the board or you’re getting attacked.
Look at Patrick Chung – very good in the box safety but his solid pass coverage, something he has been picked on before in the past, was a huge part of the Patriots beating Baltimore in the AFC Divisional playoff.
Other positions like wide receiver, where a player could have phenomenal deep speed over everything else, is where I don’t think the Pats are interested. Specialization will always be part of the game, but football has opened up so much more that athletes who can do a number of things in space are the most valuable and necessary parts of your team.
Draft Day Flashback: Matt Light Former New England Patriots (via Draft Day Flashback: Matt Light Former New England Patriots – YouTube)
https://www.patspropaganda.com/draft-day-flashback-matt-light-former-new-england/