Whoever you are you clearly have been reading the prop for a few years now because this is the kind of question that gets me fired up, Bruschi-style!
I can’t agree more on Dobson. Maybe it’s just the bad luck of 17 in recent years for receivers who we were excited about – namely Chad Jackson and Taylor Price. But it’s just not an elite outside wide receiver number, he really needs to get into the 80s, ideally to 88. But he made his choice and now he has to live with it I guess. But someday I want to get a badass #88 WR on the Pats and it’s available unless they re-sign Mulligan.
As for others I’d like to change Chandler Jones’ 95 is at the top of the list. It’s grown on me somewhat, but it’s my least favorite of the 90 numbers (and yes I know this sounds stupid).
The big question of the offseason will be who gets 55. That’s a prime number and hopefully has a nasty rookie linebacker written all over it. Spikes was perfect for it, but alas it didn’t work out.
52’s a good available one as well.
