The Rivals – Manning vs Brady
https://www.patspropaganda.com/gomanning-the-rivals-manning-vs-brady/
Uncategorized
Inside Slant: Patriots without Gronkowski – NFL Nation Blog – ESPN
Inside Slant: Patriots without Gronkowski – NFL Nation Blog – ESPN
Good read on Gronk. Safe to say that upon his return last season Brady immediately started locking on to him. There’s no question, Gronk is one of, if not the best tight end in the game. I truly believe that the Patriots Super Bowl hopes could hinge on Gronk’s availability in January and February. Who cares if he’s around for Week 1.
is it just me, or does the offense feel very “uncertain”? on defense, it seems like you know what you’re getting but offense just seems like a big bag of if’s. the sky is not falling or anything i mean we still have BB, TFB, and McD so i think everything will be okay, but I’m just itching for the offense to develop more of an identity.
Well-put. There’s no question that there are a lot of what ifs…
- What kind of jump will Dobson, Boyce, Thompkins make in year two?
- Can Dobson get healthy and make up any ground he lost?
- What will a healthy Amendola look like in year two with Brady?
- How quick can LaFell pick up the offense and contribute?
- Can Edelman build on his breakout 2013 (which really might just come down to staying healthy)?
- What will the interior of the offensive line look like? Will there be an immediate youth movement with Halapio and Stork or will they be brought along slowly?
- Can Ridley and Vereen put their issues (fumbles/injuries) behind them and turn in a consistent and healthy season? And if not, are any of the rookies, led by James White, legitimate weapons?
- When does Gronk come back and what do they do until then or if he goes down again? As of now it’s pretty scary to imagine Hooman being our #1 TE for another season.
But ultimately you’re right, no matter what happens and who improves, regresses or is lost to injury, the Pats have a history of making things work. Brady is still Brady as far as we know so that alone should make this a top-10 offense.
Of course, we all see the potential. If the receivers develop, if the running backs find their consistency, if the interior offensive line solidifies… this could be an explosive and versatile offense.
2013 was a reset year somewhat and they powered through it. No matter how things go this year, things should be better and we shouldn’t have the same kind of up-and-down start where they’re just not moving the ball.
It’s exciting to see how it will play out.
We really need to add to these, and soon.
https://www.patspropaganda.com/we-really-need-to-add-to-these-and-soon/
Do you think that if the Pats had pulled out a win at the AFC Championship that we actually would’ve won the SuperBowl? Why/why not? Part of me says yes, part of me says no…(it obviously doesn’t matter now I’d just like to know your opinion).
I think the Pats would’ve put up a better fight than the Broncos did, but it’s hard to say they’d have beaten the Seahawks, who were playing lights out ball. Even when the Pats get completely dominated, they don’t get blown out. See 2011’s eight-point loss to the Steelers as a prime example.
The Pats also put up 475 yards of offense on Seattle in 2012, in Seattle. Granted they were a far different offense in 2013 but that at least shows that Brady and Belichick had an understanding of Seattle’s defensive scheme and were able to exploit it at least that one time.
Could they have done that again with the pieces they had by the end of last year? Probably not. But I don’t think we’d have seen the kind of implosion from the Pats that we saw out of the Broncos. They’re just not that kind of team under BB.
